Verne takes pieces of information that geologists then accepted as fact, large prehistoric animals, the alteration of rock type with depth and age. But perhaps before the full impact of darwins evolution (published 1854) were appreciate, before continental drift, while there was still discussion on whether the centre of the was hot molten mass or a deep cavernous sea.
Its seems from the text that Verne doesn't really agree with the then aging concept of the hallow earth but it makes for a much better story, as opposed to the other option....
In this way the book is similar to Gulliver's Travels which, as you might recall from a previous post, Swift uses a little bit of knowledge to imagine what if. And despite the fact this information in now proved incorrect, it still makes for a good read.
So yeah its a good book, I flew through it, I could well recommend it. The two main characters are very endearing.
Other things this weekend included a trip to the BT young scientist exhibition.http://www.btyoungscientist.ie/f_version/mediacentre_winner2008.html Which was interesting, saw duncan cleary giving a not so interesting talk about cfl bulbs. Sick of hearing about it now.
Also went to see the exhibition of Polish Art in the National Gallery - Very Good.
No comments:
Post a Comment